Hi Nguyen,
We also have fixed using 3.2.7 for production - it works well for us.
I was thinking to upgrade to 3.4.x in the next month or so. I'd like to understand more - how many people are actually using 3.4.1? Can anyone (users) or from gluster/redhat chime in here - would be reassuring to hear that the latest version is also the greatest..
Regards,
Paul
On 2 December 2013 15:52, Nguyen Viet Cuong <mrcuongnv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,Actually, I have very bad experience with GlusterFS 3.3.x and 3.4.x under very high pressure (> 64 processes write in parallel in more than 10 minutes, for example). GlusterFS 3.2.7 from EPEL is really stable and we use it for production.Unfortunately, there is no official built of GlusterFS 3.2.x on Gluster's repo.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
