Thanks Lukas. Copying Lubomir. Can you confirm that http://review.gluster.org/5693 is no more needed then? Also, can you please vote on http://review.gluster.org/5979? Thanks, Avati On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka <lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com > wrote: > I was unable to reproduce the issue with patch #2 from > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5979/ > > Thank you. > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote: > >> Please pick #2 resubmission, that is fine. >> >> Avati >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka < >> lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com> wrote: >> >>> Will take about 2 hours to setup test env, also build seems to be failed >>> but does not seem to be caused by the patch :/ >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the >>>> problem of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the >>>> patch in 3.4.1. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Avati >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right >>>>> thing after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can >>>>> test it quickly. >>>>> >>>>> Avati >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka < >>>>> lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No, I see issues reported in >>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably >>>>>> related to BZ#991035. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_**64 issue with ACL is >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/ >>>>>>>> **5693/ <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/> >>>>>>>> which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets >>>>>>>> entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because >>>>>>>> ACL >>>>>>>> mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm >>>>>>>> no C >>>>>>>> expert to say so :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and >>>>>>> BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Vijay >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>>>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130920/0b6cfe6e/attachment.html>
