I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right thing after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can test it quickly. Avati On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka <lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com > wrote: > No, I see issues reported in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably > related to BZ#991035. > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka wrote: >> >>> Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_**64 issue with ACL is still >>> there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/** >>> 5693/ <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/> >>> which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets >>> entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because ACL >>> mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm no C >>> expert to say so :( >>> >>> >> Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and >> BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2? >> >> Thanks, >> Vijay >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130920/40e649cb/attachment.html>
