Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the problem of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the patch in 3.4.1. Thanks, Avati On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote: > I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right thing > after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can test it > quickly. > > Avati > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka < > lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com> wrote: > >> No, I see issues reported in >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably >> related to BZ#991035. >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Luk?? Bezdi?ka wrote: >>> >>>> Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_**64 issue with ACL is still >>>> there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/** >>>> 5693/ <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/> >>>> which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets >>>> entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because ACL >>>> mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm no C >>>> expert to say so :( >>>> >>>> >>> Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and >>> BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vijay >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130920/d608e650/attachment.html>
