2009/1/7 <a_pirania at poczta.onet.pl>: > > > "Keith Freedman" <freedman at FreeFormIT.com> napisa?(a): > > it depends what you're trying to accomplish with your filesystem. > > > > there are many alternatives each of which are suitable for specific needs. > > if you want a general purpose solution that is feature rich and > > solves a wide variety of problems, then gluster is really the best > > choice but depending on your specific nees, there may be better > > alternatives out there. > > > > > I need a redundant system files in the event of failure of the first. glusterfs is a lot of errors > What errors are you getting? :-) We surely want to fix any errors. Krishna
