"Keith Freedman" <freedman at FreeFormIT.com> napisa?(a): > it depends what you're trying to accomplish with your filesystem. > > there are many alternatives each of which are suitable for specific needs. > if you want a general purpose solution that is feature rich and > solves a wide variety of problems, then gluster is really the best > choice but depending on your specific nees, there may be better > alternatives out there. > > I need a redundant system files in the event of failure of the first. glusterfs is a lot of errors
