the block sizes would more depend on the file system you're running, not necessarily the underlying block device (lvm/raid/etc.) it's possible fc and centos have different defaults for block sizes. Also, depending on the file system, some will default to different block sizes depending on the size of the file system, so if these differ that could account for the difference in reporting. I don't think it would be du or find that's behaving differently. I'm using AFR across fc9 32 & fc9 64 bit. with different device sizes on each end and different block sizes, so I can't rely on du to be exact. glad it's all working, in any case :) I was happy with glusters performance through my recent disaster too. if you've not already, make sure you list yourself in their "whose using gluster" wiki, it'll help them get funding so they can continue their great work. At 02:37 AM 10/11/2008, Jason Haar wrote: >Krishna Srinivas wrote: > > Jason > > Can you check what the difference is between the two servers after you > > kill the copy? Do they differ in the number of files? > > Krishna > > >It's alright. I figured it out - there are major differences between >Fedora9 and CentOS5 - which means du and find return different values! >In the end I did a >"rsync -avn /home/export/ remote:/home/export" and THAT reported that >everything was in sync - so it is working. As to why du/etc returned >different values? I dunno. The CentOS5 server is running sw-raid and the >FC9 is an LVM encrypted volume - but I wouldn't have thought that would >change blocksizes/whatever. Doesn't matter - glusterfs worked! :-) > >-- >Cheers > >Jason Haar >Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. >Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 >PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 > > >_______________________________________________ >Gluster-users mailing list >Gluster-users at gluster.org >http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
