Le vendredi 26 avril 2019 à 18:50 +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:21 AM Harold Miller <harold@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > Has Red Hat security cleared the Slack systems for confidential / > > > customer information? > > > > > > If not, it will make it difficult for support to collect/answer > > > questions. > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure Amar meant as a replacement for the freenode > > #gluster and > > #gluster-dev channels, given that he sent this to the public > > gluster > > mailing lists @gluster.org. Nobody should have even been posting > > confidential and/or customer information to any of those lists or > > channels. > > And AFAIK nobody ever has. > > > > > > Yep, I am only talking about IRC (from freenode, #gluster, #gluster- > dev etc). Also, I am not saying we are 'replacing IRC'. Gluster as a > project started in pre-Slack era, and we have many users who prefer > to stay in IRC. > So, for now, no pressure to make a statement calling Slack channel as > a 'Replacement' to IRC. > > > > Amar, would you like to clarify which IRC channels you meant? > > > > > > Thanks Kaleb. I was bit confused on why the concern of it came up in > this group. Well, unless people start to be on both irc and slack and everything, that's fragmentation. Also, since people can't access old logs (per design with the free plan of slack), but they are still here on slack servers, how is it going to work from a GDPR point of view ? Shouldn't it requires a update to the privacy policy ? -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
