This list also captures the BZs which are in NEW state. The search description goes like this:
- Status: NEW
- Product: GlusterFS
- Changed: (is greater than or equal to) -4w
- Creation date: (changed after) -4w
- Keywords: (does not contain the string) Triaged
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:44 PM Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
While I understand this report captured bugs filed since last 1 week and do not have ‘Triaged’ keyword, does it make better sense to exclude bugs which aren’t in NEW state?I believe the intention of this report is to check what all bugs haven’t been looked at by maintainers/developers yet. BZs which are already fixed or in ASSIGNED/POST state need not to feature in this list is what I believe as otherwise it gives a false impression that too many bugs are getting unnoticed which isn’t the reality. Thoughts?--On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 07:15, <jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[...truncated 6 lines...]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1699023 / core: Brick is not able to detach successfully in brick_mux environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1695416 / core: client log flooding with intentional socket shutdown message when a brick is down
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1695480 / core: Global Thread Pool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1694943 / core: parallel-readdir slows down directory listing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1700295 / core: The data couldn't be flushed immediately even with O_SYNC in glfs_create or with glfs_fsync/glfs_fdatasync after glfs_write.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1698861 / disperse: Renaming a directory when 2 bricks of multiple disperse subvols are down leaves both old and new dirs on the bricks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1697293 / distribute: DHT: print hash and layout values in hexadecimal format in the logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1701039 / distribute: gluster replica 3 arbiter Unfortunately data not distributed equally
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1697971 / fuse: Segfault in FUSE process, potential use after free
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1694139 / glusterd: Error waiting for job 'heketi-storage-copy-job' to complete on one-node k3s deployment.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1695099 / glusterd: The number of glusterfs processes keeps increasing, using all available resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1692349 / project-infrastructure: gluster-csi-containers job is failing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1698716 / project-infrastructure: Regression job did not vote for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22366/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1698694 / project-infrastructure: regression job isn't voting back to gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1699712 / project-infrastructure: regression job is voting Success even in case of failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1693385 / project-infrastructure: request to change the version of fedora in fedora-smoke-job
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1695484 / project-infrastructure: smoke fails with "Build root is locked by another process"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1693184 / replicate: A brick process(glusterfsd) died with 'memory violation'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1698566 / selfheal: shd crashed while executing ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t in CI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1699309 / snapshot: Gluster snapshot fails with systemd autmounted bricks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1696633 / tests: GlusterFs v4.1.5 Tests from /tests/bugs/ module failing on Intel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1697812 / website: mention a pointer to all the mailing lists available under glusterfs project(https://www.gluster.org/community/)
[...truncated 2 lines...]_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel- Atin (atinm)_______________________________________________
Gluster-infra mailing list
Gluster-infra@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel