On 01/30/2018 06:33 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > I am not sure if the advantages outweight the difficulties with > bundling two projects into one package. My personal preference would be > to have a glusterd2 package and a glusterfs one, completely separate > from each other, just with tight Requires:... > > It is not clear to me when/if GD2 gets merged back into the glusterfs > repository. In case the projects stay separate, they should probably get > packaged that way too. In case they get merged, *yuck*, we'll have to > deal with a project that contains C, Python, Bash and Golang sources :-( > > I've suggested this before, but did not get much feedback yet, maybe > now? > - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2018-January/000439.html > - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2018-January/000444.html Who are we waiting for, for a response? Also, we brought this up in the maintainers meeting, and we needed to conclude one way or another, and chose the current mechanism. Considering RC0 is tomorrow, I would like to make it happen, and with that in mind, can the decision of separate package or a sub-package be made later (say even after the 4.0.0 release)? Shyam _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
