On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:37:20PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > This is built on top of glusterfs-3.12. Obviously this will change to > 4.0 (4.0rc0, etc.) This is derived from the > .../extras/rpms/glusterd2.spec in the glusterd2 source. > > see https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24543030 > > (Having to "bundle" the generated source and the -vendor source tar > files does make for a big .src.rpm.) > > Question for Debian and Ubuntu users: would you want to see the > glusterd2 bits included in the -common or -server sub-package or would > you like to see a separate sub-package for glusterd2? I am not sure if the advantages outweight the difficulties with bundling two projects into one package. My personal preference would be to have a glusterd2 package and a glusterfs one, completely separate from each other, just with tight Requires:... It is not clear to me when/if GD2 gets merged back into the glusterfs repository. In case the projects stay separate, they should probably get packaged that way too. In case they get merged, *yuck*, we'll have to deal with a project that contains C, Python, Bash and Golang sources :-( I've suggested this before, but did not get much feedback yet, maybe now? - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2018-January/000439.html - http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2018-January/000444.html Thanks, Niels _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
