On 01/29/2018 08:39 AM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi Shyam, > > Below patches identified lately while working on > Geo-replication+Glusterd2 integration. Patches are merged in Master and > backported to release-4.0 > > https://review.gluster.org/19343 ; (Ready to submit) > https://review.gluster.org/19364 ; (Waiting for centos regression) > > Please merge the patches. Thanks Thanks for letting me know, one patch is merged, waiting on regression tests for the other. > > > On Thursday 25 January 2018 09:49 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 01/23/2018 03:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> 4.0 release has been branched! >>> >>> I will follow this up with a more detailed schedule for the release, and >>> also the granted feature backport exceptions that we are waiting. >>> >>> Feature backports would need to make it in by this weekend, so that we >>> can tag RC0 by the end of the month. >> Backports need to be ready for merge on or before Jan, 29th 2018 3:00 PM >> Eastern TZ. >> >> Features that requested and hence are granted backport exceptions are as >> follows, >> >> 1) Dentry fop serializer xlator on brick stack >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397 >> >> @Du please backport the same to the 4.0 branch as the patch in master is >> merged. >> >> 2) Leases support on GlusterFS >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350 >> >> @Jiffin and @ndevos, there is one patch pending against master, >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/ please do the needful and backport >> this to the 4.0 branch. >> >> 3) Data corruption in write ordering of rebalance and application writes >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308 >> >> @susant, @du if we can conclude on the strategy here, please backport as >> needed. >> >> 4) Couple of patches that are tracked for a backport are, >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/ >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/ (prep for ctime changes in later >> releases) >> >> Other features discussed are not in scope for a backports to 4.0. >> >> If you asked for one and do not see it in this list, shout out! >> >>> Only exception could be: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shyam >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> maintainers mailing list >> maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
