On 01/26/2018 06:41 AM, Raghavendra G wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa > <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, > "GlusterFS Maintainers" <maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:49:51 PM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Branched > > > > On 01/23/2018 03:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > > 4.0 release has been branched! > > > > > > I will follow this up with a more detailed schedule for the release, and > > > also the granted feature backport exceptions that we are waiting. > > > > > > Feature backports would need to make it in by this weekend, so that we > > > can tag RC0 by the end of the month. > > > > Backports need to be ready for merge on or before Jan, 29th 2018 3:00 PM > > Eastern TZ. > > > > Features that requested and hence are granted backport exceptions are as > > follows, > > > > 1) Dentry fop serializer xlator on brick stack > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397 > <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397> > > > > @Du please backport the same to the 4.0 branch as the patch in master is > > merged. > > Sure. > > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19340/1 > But this might fail smoke as the bug associated is not associated with > 4.0 branch. Blocked on 4.0 version tag in bugzilla. Fixed this up to refer to the feature and removed the bug reference and change the gerrit topic. > > > > > > 2) Leases support on GlusterFS > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350 > <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350> > > > > @Jiffin and @ndevos, there is one patch pending against master, > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/ > <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/> please do the needful and > backport > > this to the 4.0 branch. > > > > 3) Data corruption in write ordering of rebalance and application writes > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308 > <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308> > > > > @susant, @du if we can conclude on the strategy here, please backport as > > needed. > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19207/ > <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19207/> > Review comments need to be addressed and centos regressions are failing. > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19202/ > <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19202/> > There are some suggestions on the patch. If others agree they are > valid, this patch can be considered as redundant with approach of > #19207. However, as I've mentioned in the comments there are some > tradeoffs too. So, Waiting for response to my comments. If nobody > responds in the time period given, we can merge the patch and susant > will have to backport to 4.0 branch. > > > > > 4) Couple of patches that are tracked for a backport are, > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/ > <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/> > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/ > <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/> (prep for ctime changes in later > > releases) > > > > Other features discussed are not in scope for a backports to 4.0. > > > > If you asked for one and do not see it in this list, shout out! > > > > > > > > Only exception could be: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/ > <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/> > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shyam > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > maintainers mailing list > > maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel> > > > > > -- > Raghavendra G _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
