On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:50:04PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:17:24AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:00:56AM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > > <top post> > > > > > > > > I realize we're behind on this, but I'd like us to make sure we're all > > > > aligned on releasing good product. Can we say by EOD Tuesday, we're in > > > > agreement on what we're testing / what's not being tested? > > > > > > > > I know that there's at least a bug or two that are outstanding for > > > > 3.9, and Vijay will need to weigh in on this as well. > > > > > > Because 3.9 should get updates every month, isn't it good to get > > > something out that addresses at least some bugs? > > > > My sentiments exactly. > > > > > There does not seem > > > to be a 3.9.1 tracker, so I can not find any bugs that are marked as > > > absolute blockers for the update. A pointer to those bugs would be > > > welcome. > > > > Shall we just recycle the 3.9.0 tracker? > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350744 > > Not sure what you mean with 'recycle'. Just create a similar one for > 3.9.1 just like we do for all other versions? I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.9.1 Assuming that Kalebs offer still is valid, this bug has been assigned to him. Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
