Re: What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nothing?


The reason I asked for 2 maintainers for the release is so that there will be load distribution. But unfortunately the pairing was bad, both of us are impacted by the same work which is leading to not enough time for upstream release maintenance. Last time I was loaded a bit less so took care of most of the things at the end with help from Amye and Vijay. But this time I am swamped with work too. Please suggest how we can get the release out.

May be Aravinda can add if he is a bit free to do this.
 

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> There was considerable discussion in the community meeting yesterday.
>
> If we're not going to get one (any time soon) I'm contemplating a
> 3.9.0-n+1 update in Fedora, Ubuntu Launchpad PPA, etc., that would
> consist of 3.9.0 plus all the commits to the release-3.9 branch to date.
>
> Obviously I'd rather have an official 3.9.1 release by the maintainers.
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



--
Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux