Re: What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:00:56AM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> > <top post>
> > 
> > I realize we're behind on this, but I'd like us to make sure we're all
> > aligned on releasing good product. Can we say by EOD Tuesday, we're in
> > agreement on what we're testing / what's not being tested?
> > 
> > I know that there's at least a bug or two that are outstanding for
> > 3.9, and Vijay will need to weigh in on this as well.
> 
> Because 3.9 should get updates every month, isn't it good to get
> something out that addresses at least some bugs?

My sentiments exactly.

> There does not seem
> to be a 3.9.1 tracker, so I can not find any bugs that are marked as
> absolute blockers for the update. A pointer to those bugs would be
> welcome.

Shall we just recycle the 3.9.0 tracker?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350744

--

Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux