----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:00:56AM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > <top post> > > > > > > I realize we're behind on this, but I'd like us to make sure we're all > > > aligned on releasing good product. Can we say by EOD Tuesday, we're in > > > agreement on what we're testing / what's not being tested? > > > > > > I know that there's at least a bug or two that are outstanding for > > > 3.9, and Vijay will need to weigh in on this as well. > > > > Because 3.9 should get updates every month, isn't it good to get > > something out that addresses at least some bugs? > > My sentiments exactly. > > > There does not seem > > to be a 3.9.1 tracker, so I can not find any bugs that are marked as > > absolute blockers for the update. A pointer to those bugs would be > > welcome. > > Shall we just recycle the 3.9.0 tracker? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350744 > Perhaps like we do now with versions in bugzilla, where we have only 3.8, 3.9, 3.10 (versus 3.8.[0123456...], 3.9.[0123...], etc.) maybe we only need a single tracker for all of 3.9? And another for 3.10? And so on. -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
