On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda <avishwan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 for Prashanth's approach.
+1
regards AravindaOn 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal <humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again' approach.Both approaches require cloning again, so which on are we voting for? 1. Prashanth's approach - modify existing repo - users re clone - push force to their forks on github 2. Misc's approach - create a new minified repo - users clone/fork the new repo I don't mind either.+2 on the same thought. :)_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
