Re: Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1 for Prashanth's approach.
regards
Aravinda
On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
<humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:




On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




          
All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
approach.

      
Both approaches require cloning again, so which on are we voting for?

1. Prashanth's approach
    - modify existing repo
    - users re clone
    - push force to their forks on github

2. Misc's approach
  - create a new minified repo
  - users clone/fork the new repo

I don't mind either.

+2 on the same thought. :)





_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux