Re: Possible spurious failure - ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failing on 3.8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Saravanakumar Arumugam" <sarumuga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 6:48:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Possible spurious failure - ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failing on 3.8
> 
> This seems spurious. I have verified in master branch and test passed.
> Let me know if you see this again.

In that case, can we move it to bad tests, or investigate further whats causing the "spuriousness"? It might as well be a timing issue :).

> 
> Thanks,
> saravaana
> 
> On 05/04/2016 06:35 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> > Please have a look at:
> > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/20432/consoleFull
> >
> > However the test runs successfully on my local machine, making me wonder
> > whether its a spurious failure
> >
> > [root@unused glusterfs]# prove ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t
> > ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t .. tar: Removing leading `/' from
> > member names
> > ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t .. ok
> > All tests successful.
> > Files=1, Tests=11, 23 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.01 sys +  0.64 cusr
> > 0.61 csys =  1.28 CPU)
> > Result: PASS
> >
> > I've re-triggered the centos regression.
> >
> > regards,
> > Raghavendra
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux