Re: Possible spurious failure - ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failing on 3.8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This seems spurious. I have verified in master branch and test passed.
Let me know if you see this again.

Thanks,
saravaana

On 05/04/2016 06:35 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
Please have a look at:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/20432/consoleFull

However the test runs successfully on my local machine, making me wonder whether its a spurious failure

[root@unused glusterfs]# prove ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t
./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t .. tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=11, 23 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.01 sys +  0.64 cusr  0.61 csys =  1.28 CPU)
Result: PASS

I've re-triggered the centos regression.

regards,
Raghavendra

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux