On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:21:40AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > If it is in CentOS CI, then why do we need vagrant? I'm not sure how vagrant > > would make things more simple. > > > > We can use duffy to provision the machines, we can use gdeploy to install > > glusterfs and use distaf to run the tests. In the nightly job I created, it > > is using the same (minus the gdeploy, they don't have gdeploy in pypi yet). > > It might not be all about simplicity. What about the time and resource > usage for provisioning in duffy vs. vagrant? Duffy has a pool of pre-installed machines for different CentOS versions and architectures. Requesting a few machines from Duffy is normally instant. I guess it takes more time to download (or build?) the Vagrant box. Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
