Hey Vijay, Awesome work on the tests! Could you please list down the tests you run for releases? This would help the other release-maintainers could run them as well. We could also try automating these tests, so that it becomes even easier. ~kaushal On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey All, > > I have been running tests with the latest HEAD of release-3.7 on a 2x2 > distributed replicated volume. Here are some updates: > > - Write Performance has seen an improvement as seen by running perf-test.sh > [1] > > > v3.7.9 with FUSE client > > Testname Time > emptyfiles_create 961.83 > emptyfiles_delete 600.08 > smallfiles_create 1508.38 > smallfiles_rewrite 1325.60 > smallfiles_read 598.50 > smallfiles_reread 384.65 > smallfiles_delete 623.66 > largefile_create 18.33 > largefile_rewrite 19.17 > largefile_read 11.44 > largefile_reread 0.31 > largefile_delete 0.66 > directory_crawl_create 981.21 > directory_crawl 30.64 > directory_recrawl 28.01 > metadata_modify 1117.92 > directory_crawl_delete 423.08 > > v3.7.8 with FUSE client > > Testname Time > emptyfiles_create 953.87 > emptyfiles_delete 577.46 > smallfiles_create 1837.33 > smallfiles_rewrite 2349.37 > smallfiles_read 604.22 > smallfiles_reread 394.48 > smallfiles_delete 629.74 > largefile_create 73.86 > largefile_rewrite 76.23 > largefile_read 11.36 > largefile_reread 0.31 > largefile_delete 0.65 > directory_crawl_create 985.16 > directory_crawl 31.10 > directory_recrawl 26.94 > metadata_modify 1422.60 > directory_crawl_delete 382.57 > > Hopefully this addresses the write performance drop we observed with 3.7.8. > > - Regular file system test tools like iozone, dbench etc. are running fine > with the fuse client. > > - Rolling upgrade from 3.7.8 to the latest release-3.7 HEAD worked fine with > I/O happening from a fuse client. > > - There is a memory leak in FUSE client that I observed while running > perf-test.sh. A statedump revealed that there was a ref leak on several > inodes. I have sent a possible patch [2] which addressed problems in my test > setup. This does need careful review and more testing. Given the memory > leaks we have been observing with fuse, I feel that it would be good to > review mount/fuse for possible leaks and run more tests before releasing > 3.7.9. I am looking at pushing out tagging by 2-3 days to mid week to > accomplish this. Niels, Raghavendra - can you provide additional help with > reviewing here? > > - Tiering has seen a lot of patches in 3.7.9. Dan, Nithya - can you please > assist in preparation of release notes by summarizing the changes and > providing inputs on the general readiness of tiering? > > Thanks, > Vijay > > [1] https://github.com/avati/perf-test/blob/master/perf-test.sh > > [2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13689/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
