On 01/28/2016 12:50 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Yes, that should be good. Better to have just one version of the routine. Also, I
think Ravi found a bug in brick_up_status() [or the _1 version?].
http://review.gluster.org/12913 fixed it upstream already. It wasn't
sent to 3.7.
I think the patch http://review.gluster.org/13276 in 3.7 probably
hand-copied brick_up_status() from an earlier git HEAD
So, that should
also be incorporated.
You'll probably get a conflict during backport as the routine was hand copied.
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
