patch #10954

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Sakshi,

patch #10954 was not backported to 3.7 (for whatever reason) but introduced a helper routine
brick_up_status() in tests/volume.rc. This routine was used in writing test cases for couple
of patches

        http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13120/
        http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13044/

Obviously they fail regression when backported to 3.7. For now the routine has been hand copied
(thanks Pranith) in one the patches due to 3.7.7 urgency. There also exist a similar routine
brick_up_status_1() introduced by

        http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13116/

which has been backported to 3.7, yet to get merged.

I'm thinking of changing all callers (just a handful) of brick_up_status() to use brick_up_status_1()
over backporting the initial patch (which was merged in master about 4 months ago).

What do you think? Does the original patch need a backport?

Thanks.

        Venky
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux