On 01/27/2016 11:11 AM, Sakshi Bansal wrote: > Hi, > > I suppose someone from glusterd team can confirm if the patch #10954 requires a backport to 3.7. If anything is going in mainline I'd encourage the same to be backported irrespective of the severity of the fix, so that's out of the equation. > > Even if a backport is required it would probably be better to first remove brick_up_status() and use just brick_up_status_1() > or vice versa (to avoid any further confusion on which function to use) and then backport the #10954 patch. I'd like to stick to remove brick_up_status(). Please use the same in all the places. You can include all these changes in the same backport but please ensure the commit message explains the delta between mainline and the backport. > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
