On 01/28/2016 09:57 AM, Sakshi Bansal wrote: > >> If anything is going in mainline I'd encourage the same to be backported >> irrespective of the severity of the fix, so that's out of the equation. > Will keep this is mind in future. > > >> I'd like to stick to remove brick_up_status(). Please use the same in >> all the places. You can include all these changes in the same backport >> but please ensure the commit message explains the delta between mainline >> and the backport. > Since it is required to remove one of the redundant functions in upstream as well, > would it be better to just backport patch #10954 and send a separate patch to remove > the redundant function in upstream and on 3.7? That's your call :) > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
