On 07/01/2015 03:03 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx >> wrote: > >> >>> Yeah this followed by glusterd restart should help >>> >>> But frankly, i was hoping that 'rm' the file isn't a neat way to fix this >>> issue >> >> Why is rm not a neat way? Is it because the container deployment tool >> needs to >> know about gluster internals? But isn't a Dockerfile dealing with details >> of the service(s) that is being deployment in a container. >> > > IIUC post 'rm' we need to restart glusterd, but touching a file as part of > Dockerfile > would bringup glusterd with the new UUID. I haven't tried this tho' > > I guess like Humble said, fixing this in glusterd seems ideal > The above discussion was _if_ glusterd continues the current behavior > then either 'rm' or 'touch' methods could be considered. Here you go, http://review.gluster.org/11488 should fix it and yes the changes are in glusterD ;) > > thanx, > deepak > -- ~Atin _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
