On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah this followed by glusterd restart should help
>
> But frankly, i was hoping that 'rm' the file isn't a neat way to fix this
> issue
Why is rm not a neat way? Is it because the container deployment tool needs to
know about gluster internals? But isn't a Dockerfile dealing with details
of the service(s) that is being deployment in a container.
IIUC post 'rm' we need to restart glusterd, but touching a file as part of Dockerfile
would bringup glusterd with the new UUID. I haven't tried this tho'
I guess like Humble said, fixing this in glusterd seems ideal
The above discussion was _if_ glusterd continues the current behavior
then either 'rm' or 'touch' methods could be considered.
thanx,
deepak
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
