----- Original Message ----- From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Krishnan Parthasarathi" <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Shyam" <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, 22 May, 2015 9:49:15 AM Subject: Re: Spurious regression: Checking on 3 test cases On 05/22/2015 07:13 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote: > >> Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or, >> noticed by others? >> >> 1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t >> Run: >> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull >> >> 2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t >> Run: >> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9406/consoleFull >> Right now there is no easy fix for the issue. It may require to reconstruct entire netgroup/export structures used for this feature. >> NOTE: This is a regression run for the same patch as in (1) above, and >> ec-5-1.t passed in this instance. >> >> 3) ./tests/performance/open-behind.t >> Run: >> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9407/consoleFull > I remember seeing this test fail a few days back but seem to have missed including this test in the etherpad. > None of the above tests are being tracked at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures. > Should we add them to the list? Yes and we should add them to is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh too. Thanks, Vijay _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
