On 05/22/2015 07:13 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or, noticed by others? 1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t Run: http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull 2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t Run: http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9406/consoleFull NOTE: This is a regression run for the same patch as in (1) above, and ec-5-1.t passed in this instance. 3) ./tests/performance/open-behind.t Run: http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9407/consoleFull
I remember seeing this test fail a few days back but seem to have missed including this test in the etherpad.
None of the above tests are being tracked at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures. Should we add them to the list?
Yes and we should add them to is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh too. Thanks, Vijay _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
