> Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or, > noticed by others? > > 1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t > Run: > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull > > 2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t > Run: > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9406/consoleFull > > NOTE: This is a regression run for the same patch as in (1) above, and > ec-5-1.t passed in this instance. > > 3) ./tests/performance/open-behind.t > Run: > http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9407/consoleFull None of the above tests are being tracked at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures. Should we add them to the list? _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
