Cool. :) Will this become a voting issue in the future, after a proven period of stability or something? Also, did the CentOS 7 issues get resolved, or is that still something to be done? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift On 10 Mar 2015, at 07:05, Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I thought this would be interesting to share with the Gluster community as well. > > thanx, > deepak > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM > Subject: [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Hi All, > Quick update. > > We added GlusterFS CI job (gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs) to check pipeline (non-voting) after the patch @ [1] was merged. > > Its been running successfully ( so far so good ) on Cinder patches, few examples are in [2] > > I also updated the 3rd party CI status page [3] with the current status. > > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/162556 > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162532/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157956/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160682/ > [3]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status > > thanx, > deepak & bharat > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
