I thought this would be interesting to share with the Gluster community as well.
thanx,
deepak
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM
Subject: [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM
Subject: [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All,
Quick update.
We added GlusterFS CI job (gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs) to check pipeline (non-voting) after the patch @ [1] was merged.
Its been running successfully ( so far so good ) on Cinder patches, few examples are in [2]
I also updated the 3rd party CI status page [3] with the current status.
[1]: https://review.openstack.org/162556
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162532/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157956/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160682/
[3]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status
thanx,
deepak & bharat
Quick update.
We added GlusterFS CI job (gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs) to check pipeline (non-voting) after the patch @ [1] was merged.
Its been running successfully ( so far so good ) on Cinder patches, few examples are in [2]
I also updated the 3rd party CI status page [3] with the current status.
[1]: https://review.openstack.org/162556
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162532/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157956/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160682/
[3]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status
thanx,
deepak & bharat
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
