Re: question on glustershd

[Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---

From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 4:42:59 PM
Subject: Re: question on glustershd

On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:28:49AM -0500, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> Here's the patch I was talking about: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9240/1

Unfortunately it does not fix entry-self-heal.t  which still fails at the
same place. I wonder if the same change should not be done also on inode
lock attempts that are done in data and entry heal code.

Could you provide the trace logs you had added with this failure?

-Krutika

OTOH, it seems to have fixed self-heald.t which suffered a similar problem
on the test commented as "Test that ongoing IO is not considered as
Pending heal"

I have to test a bit more to be sure.

--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel