Re: question on glustershd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 4:09:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] question on glustershd

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:31:10AM -0500, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> We (AFR team) had a discussion about this and came to the conclusion that the code doing tryinodelk()s in metadata self-heal can be safely removed, for which I will be sending a patch.
>
> With this patch (once it is out), could you run this test a couple of times again and let us know if the inodelk collision logs are still appearing?
Hello,

Here's the patch I was talking about: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9240/1
-Krutika
Sure!

--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux