Re: question on glustershd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:28:49AM -0500, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> Here's the patch I was talking about: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9240/1 

Unfortunately it does not fix entry-self-heal.t  which still fails at the
same place. I wonder if the same change should not be done also on inode
lock attempts that are done in data and entry heal code.

OTOH, it seems to have fixed self-heald.t which suffered a similar problem
on the test commented as "Test that ongoing IO is not considered as 
Pending heal"

I have to test a bit more to be sure.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux