On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:58:08PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote: > > > > 3. In our test case the fd number returned by vfs_gluster for the > > initial open file _was_ 0. That dirfd() condition needs a fix, I > > think? > > Yep. That's why I fixed it in master and 4.0.x, it already came up in > a breakage of a different vfs module that used the same trick. > > > I don't know if the master branch has equivalent code elsewhere, > > couldn't find it easily.. > > Oh now I understand, that's the broken code I fixed in master :-). > It's already been back-ported to 4.0.x. > > You'll need to back port the dirfd removal fixes from 4.0.x to > 3.6.x in order for this to wotk. The bugzilla entry is #9778 - Samba directory code uses dirfd() without vectoring through a VFS call. Re-open it and request a back-port of this code to 3.6.x and I'll work on it. Sorry, not easy for me to do right now. Jeremy.
