On 5/29/13 1:58 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
3. In our test case the fd number returned by vfs_gluster for the
initial open file _was_ 0. That dirfd() condition needs a fix, I
think?
Yep. That's why I fixed it in master and 4.0.x, it already came up in
a breakage of a different vfs module that used the same trick.
I don't know if the master branch has equivalent code elsewhere,
couldn't find it easily..
Oh now I understand, that's the broken code I fixed in master :-).
It's already been back-ported to 4.0.x.
You'll need to back port the dirfd removal fixes from 4.0.x to
3.6.x in order for this to wotk.
Phew! OK. That was a twisted rediscovery :-)
So that means v9 is still good as it is submitted against master. Merge
please? :-)
Avati
