On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote: > > 3. In our test case the fd number returned by vfs_gluster for the > initial open file _was_ 0. That dirfd() condition needs a fix, I > think? Yep. That's why I fixed it in master and 4.0.x, it already came up in a breakage of a different vfs module that used the same trick. > I don't know if the master branch has equivalent code elsewhere, > couldn't find it easily.. Oh now I understand, that's the broken code I fixed in master :-). It's already been back-ported to 4.0.x. You'll need to back port the dirfd removal fixes from 4.0.x to 3.6.x in order for this to wotk. Jeremy.
