On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:48:04 +0530, Pavan T C <tcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wednesday 24 August 2011 09:02 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus<manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another issue: glusterfs client eats a lot of memory. It grows up
as big
as 222 Mo in a few minutes. Here is top(1) output:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU
COMMAND
19913 root 83 0 222M 122M RUN 6:52 42.97% 42.97%
glusterfsd
I do not think there is a leak, since that remain fairly stable.
That is
still big. Is it a number considered reasonable? Is there a way to
tune
memory usage for smaller systems (cache size?)
No answer to that one. Are the numbers I have something common, or
is
there a problem to fix?
This is normal.
Perhaps a more appropriate question would be: "How can this be
improved?"
Gordan
