Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another issue: glusterfs client eats a lot of memory. It grows up as big > as 222 Mo in a few minutes. Here is top(1) output: > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 19913 root 83 0 222M 122M RUN 6:52 42.97% 42.97% glusterfsd > > I do not think there is a leak, since that remain fairly stable. That is > still big. Is it a number considered reasonable? Is there a way to tune > memory usage for smaller systems (cache size?) No answer to that one. Are the numbers I have something common, or is there a problem to fix? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx
