Pavan T C <tcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The glusterfs server process uses iomem pools. Initially, it starts with > one pool. Under memory pressure, it allocates more, but does not give > back the pool when the pressure decreases. It can be debated whether > this is a bug, but one can come up with heuristics to free the pool. I was concerned about machines with little memory. It would be nice to have the ability to tell glusterfsd to avoid eating too much memory for performances: if you do not have that memory, you clearly prefer to have poor performance than to have a crash. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx
