On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:19:49 +0530 Vikas Gorur <vikas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is definitely something GlusterFS is designed to handle. I've > set up this configuration in our lab and am looking into it. Excellent ! > Specifically, on dfsC you should have > > subvolumes gfs-dfsD-ds gfs-ds > > and on dfsD you should have > > subvolumes gfs-ds gfs-dfsC-ds > > Is this the case? If not, failover will not work. Yes, this is the case. For the sake of completeness, the server configs are as follows : dfsC : http://pastebin.ca/978276 dfsD : http://pastebin.ca/967749 And the client config : dfsA : http://pastebin.ca/967754 Thank you all for your emails and interest in my test case. I would really like to use GlusterFS, since (on paper) it seems to have everything we want for our current and upcoming projects. Hopefully we can find a simple solution to the problem ! -- Daniel Maher <dma AT witbe.net>
