Re: two-node HA cluster failover test - failed again :(

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,
 Can you change 'option page-count 16' to 'option page-count 2' and try
again? I have seen issues with high page-count values earlier.

Regards,
Amar

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Daniel Maher
<dma+gluster@xxxxxxxxx<dma%2Bgluster@xxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:19:49 +0530 Vikas Gorur <vikas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > This is definitely something GlusterFS is designed to handle. I've
> > set up this configuration in our lab and am looking into it.
>
> Excellent !
>
> > Specifically, on dfsC you should have
> >
> >   subvolumes gfs-dfsD-ds gfs-ds
> >
> > and on dfsD you should have
> >
> >   subvolumes gfs-ds gfs-dfsC-ds
> >
> > Is this the case? If not, failover will not work.
>
> Yes, this is the case.  For the sake of completeness, the server
> configs are as follows :
> dfsC : http://pastebin.ca/978276
> dfsD : http://pastebin.ca/967749
>
> And the client config :
> dfsA : http://pastebin.ca/967754
>
> Thank you all for your emails and interest in my test case.  I would
> really like to use GlusterFS, since (on paper) it seems to have
> everything we want for our current and upcoming projects.  Hopefully we
> can find a simple solution to the problem !
>
>
> --
> Daniel Maher <dma AT witbe.net>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Supercomputing and Superstorage!


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux