Re: distributed locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian Taber wrote:
> I have been running Dovecot and Postfix with a 2 brick setup and posix
> locking enabled on each brick for a while with no problems.  This is a
> Maildir setup...  Dovecot is setup to use fcntl for locking.... remember
> that gluster does not support flock as fuse does not support it...

Yes, I'm aware of this. But in your place, I would stop doing this until
the GlusterFS QA test runs successfully. If it doesn't, then not losing
data with such a setup is just a matter of luck. And for this storage
application, I can't accept the risk.

>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>>
>>> Everything works fine as long as I don't introduce locking, which is
>>> essential if one wishes to use the storage eg. as a backend for a mail
>>> server.
>> I'm sorry that I cannot answer your question, but do you have a choice in
>> what mail server to use? Those that use the Maildir format (Like for
>> example Postfix together with Courier-IMAP) does not need locking.




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux