performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



     Hey all,

     Running glusterfs-1.3.5 on CentOS5 on the server 4.5 on the
server.  Ran iozone to see what the performance was.  Gluster was
about 1ms/read slower than NFS.  Doesn't sound like much I know but
when your reading through 800MB of medical image it adds up.

     Would someone please be so kind as to give some guidance of where to
look to tune this?  And can it even be tuned to as fast as NFS.
Faster is better.

     Thanks much.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Johnson |Internet: johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Systems Administrator       |Web:      http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson
NMR Center                  |Voice:    617.726.0949
Mass. General Hospital      |FAX:      617.726.7422
149 (2301) 13th Street      |Experts have expert fun
Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA |telling us things can't be done.  Piet Hein
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux