Chris, posting your volume specification files will help us tune it futher. Also, what fuse version (kernel module) are you using? thanks, avati 2007/11/6, Chris Johnson <johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hey all, > > Running glusterfs-1.3.5 on CentOS5 on the server 4.5 on the > server. Ran iozone to see what the performance was. Gluster was > about 1ms/read slower than NFS. Doesn't sound like much I know but > when your reading through 800MB of medical image it adds up. > > Would someone please be so kind as to give some guidance of where to > look to tune this? And can it even be tuned to as fast as NFS. > Faster is better. > > Thanks much. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Chris Johnson |Internet: johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Systems Administrator |Web: > http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson > NMR Center |Voice: 617.726.0949 > Mass. General Hospital |FAX: 617.726.7422 > 149 (2301) 13th Street |Experts have expert fun > Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA |telling us things can't be done. Piet Hein > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law. -- Hofstadter's Law
