Re: ref name troubles, was Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce %<branch> as shortcut to the tracked branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:40:29PM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
>> So yea, you can create a branch named "foo@{1}".
>
> But you can't actually refer to it:
>
>   $ git branch foo@{1}
>   $ git show foo@{1} --
>   fatal: bad revision 'foo@{1}'
>
> which implies that nobody is actually using it for anything.

I think you are right.  It is just "git branch" and perhaps "git
update-ref" are too loose in enforcing what can be created.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux