Hi,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:40:29PM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> >
> >> So yea, you can create a branch named "foo@{1}".
> >
> > But you can't actually refer to it:
> >
> > $ git branch foo@{1}
> > $ git show foo@{1} --
> > fatal: bad revision 'foo@{1}'
> >
> > which implies that nobody is actually using it for anything.
>
> I think you are right. It is just "git branch" and perhaps "git
> update-ref" are too loose in enforcing what can be created.
"git branch" I agree with, but not "git update-ref". As plumbing, the
latter should be much more allowing, feeding rope aplenty (but also
allowing cool tricks we do not think about yet).
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
